I learned from Apple and NVIDIA that these companies are the sum of
a group
of people, which together serve to innovate.
I think in the future, with super intelligence, there can exist one
or multiple
paradigms of collaboration between human to human, human
to machine, and
machine to machine. I am curious and puzzled by this question: which paradigm
is economically best for innovation?
At least, I am hopeful that the paradigm that wins out is the one where humans
and machines collaborate to drive innovation forward.
I think it's very likely that everyone, with super intelligence, will be able
to create
more with this technology. Fundamentally, the goal of a
company is to innovate
to serve humanity better.
The reason humans will be in the loop of innovation in a company is
because
creating and building is almost an infinite pie, where
everyone builds on top of
each other rather than one person building
something that would take away an
opportunity for others to build. In this case, super intelligence will create some
very awesome companies. And so will the combination of humans and machines.
What machines can and will solve, I think, is the fundamental math,
science, and
physics. But I think this will enable more opportunities
to build more meaningful
things.